Choose Darwaza when
You want adaptability and low friction
This is the better fit when the building does not justify a full intercom install, or when the team wants a simpler visitor contact method tied to phones already in use.
Comparison
Darwaza vs traditional intercom systems
Intercoms are designed around fixed infrastructure. Darwaza is designed around mobile contact and QR access points. That means the better choice depends on whether you need building-grade hardware or a faster-to-deploy signaling layer.
| Factor | Darwaza | Traditional intercom |
|---|---|---|
| Physical infrastructure | Minimal | Higher |
| Setup speed | Fast | Slower |
| Visitor contact method | QR scan | Panel or handset |
| Fit for permanent building systems | Limited | Strong |
| Fit for flexible and mobile-first workflows | Strong | Weaker |
Choose intercom when
You want fixed infrastructure to be the product
For large buildings and permanent access-control environments, traditional intercom systems still have a clear role.